Warum die Schweizer Haftbefehle gegen die drei Steuerfahnder richtig sind

Die Schweizer Strafverfolgungsbehörden haben Haftbefehle gegen drei deutsche Steuerfahnder erlassen, da diese mit dem Ankauf der sog. “Steuer CD” möglicherweise gegen schweizerische Strafgesetze – Schutz des Bankgeheimnisses und Wirtschaftsspionage – verstoßen haben. Über ein Rechtshilfe-Ersuchen wurde jetzt die Vernehmung der drei Beamten in Deutschland durch deutsche Behörden beantragt. Soweit ein ganz normaler rechtstaatlicher Vorgang.

Angesichts der vorherrschenden hysterischen Reaktionen in der deutschen Politik müssen sich die drei Steuerfahnder aber keine großen Sorgen machen: “Für mich ist das ein ungeheuerlicher Vorgang. Wir verwahren uns als Land Nordrhein-Westfalen davor, dass unsere Mitarbeiter in ein kriminelles Licht gerückt werden.” meint die derzeitige und wohl auch zukünftige Ministerpräsidentin von NRW, Hannelore Kraft. Auch ihr halbherziger Herausforderer Norbert Röttgen stößt ins gleiche Horn: “Wir sind natürlich mit unseren Beamten solidarisch und diese Haftbefehle waren vollkommen inakzeptabel.” SPD-Fraktionsgeschäftsführer Thomas Oppermann will die drei Steuerfahndern sogar mit dem Bundesverdienstkreuz auszeichnen, da sich diese “um den Rechtsstaat verdient gemacht haben”. Gerade von Oppermann ist diese Kritik verwunderlich, ist dieser doch sonst ein großer Verfechter des Schutzes der Privatheit von Daten vor staatlichem Zugriff.

Es gilt aber das, was Finanzminister Wolfgang Schäuble erkannt hat: “Die Schweiz hat ihr Strafrecht, und in der Schweiz ist die Verletzung des Bankgeheimnisses mit Strafe bedroht.” FDP Generalsekretär Döring merkt ebenfalls an: “Es ist nicht verwunderlich, dass die Schweizer Behörden kein Interesse daran haben, dass Straftaten in ihrem Land belohnt werden.”

Und nicht nur die Schweiz hat ihr Strafrecht: Die drei Beamten könnten sich auch nach deutschem Recht möglicherweise strafbar gemacht haben, da der Ankauf der Steuer-CDs durchaus gegen § 17 Abs. 2 UWG (Verrat von Geschäfts- und Betriebsgeheimnissen) verstossen haben oder zumindest eine strafbare Begünstigung (§ 257 StGB) der illegalen Beschaffung darstellen könnte. Um dies abschließend zu beurteilen, müsste man freilich mehr Hintergrundinformationen über den Vorgang haben – und diese wird es wohl nicht geben. So hat das Bundesverfassungsgericht die Verwertung von Steuer CD-Daten in einem konkreten Fall zwar zugelassen (2 BvR 2101/09 vom 9.11.2010), weist aber auch auf die unklare Vorgeschichte hin. Sollte es aber stimmen, dass den Verrätern konkrete Anweisungen gegeben wurden, dürfte eine Strafbarkeit der drei Finanzbeamten auch nach deutschem Recht unstreitig sein.

Sicher, Sigmar “Siggi Pop” Gabriel ist zuzustimmen, wenn sagt “Wer sein Geld am Finanzamt vorbei in die Schweiz schickt, handelt nicht nur asozial, sondern ist Straftäter in Deutschland.” Aber die eine Straftat rechtfertigt nicht eine andere. Der Rechtsstaat darf sich eben gerade nicht der Mittel seiner Gegner bedienen. Insbesondere aber sollten wir auch die Souveränität der Schweiz achten und nicht mit einer “am deutschen Wesen soll die Welt genesen” Attitüde abtun, sondern diese Gesetze ebenso achten, wie wir erwarten, dass unsere Gesetze geachtet werden.

3. April 1948 – Unterzeichnung des Marshall-Plans

I need not tell you gentlemen that the world situation is very serious. That must be apparent to all intelligent people. I think one difficulty is that the problem is one of such enormous complexity that the very mass of facts presented to the public by press and radio make it exceedingly difficult for the man in the street to reach a clear appraisement of the situation. Furthermore, the people of this country are distant from the troubled areas of the earth and it is hard for them to comprehend the plight and consequent reaction of the long-suffering peoples, and the effect of those reactions on their governments in connection with our efforts to promote peace in the world.
In considering the requirements for the rehabilitation of Europe the physical loss of life, the visible destruction of cities, factories, mines, and railroads was correctly estimated, but it has become obvious during recent months that this visible destruction was probably less serious than the dislocation of the entire fabric of European economy. For the past 10 years conditions have been highly abnormal. The feverish maintenance of the war effort engulfed all aspects of national economics. Machinery has fallen into disrepair or is entirely obsolete. Under the arbitrary and destructive Nazi rule, virtually every possible enterprise was geared into the German war machine. Long-standing commercial ties, private institutions, banks, insurance companies and shipping companies disappeared, through the loss of capital, absorption through nationalization or by simple destruction. In many countries, confidence in the local currency has been severely shaken. The breakdown of the business structure of Europe during the war was complete. Recovery has been seriously retarded by the fact that 2 years after the close of hostilities a peace settlement with Germany and Austria has not been agreed upon. But even given a more prompt solution of these difficult problems, the rehabilitation of the economic structure of Europe quite evidently will require a much longer time and greater effort than had been foreseen.
There is a phase of this matter which is both interesting and serious. The farmer has always produced the foodstuffs to exchange with the city dweller for the other necessities of life. This division of labor is the basis of modern civilization. At the present time it is threatened with breakdown. The town and city industries are not producing adequate goods to exchange with the food-producing farmer. Raw materials and fuel are in short supply. Machinery is lacking or worn out. The farmer or the peasant cannot find the goods for sale which he desires to purchase. So the sale of his farm produce for money which he cannot use seems to him unprofitable transaction. He, therefore, has withdrawn many fields from crop cultivation and is using them for grazing. He feeds more grain to stock and finds for himself and his family an ample supply of food, however short he may be on clothing and the other ordinary gadgets of civilization. Meanwhile people in the cities are short of food and fuel. So the governments are forced to use their foreign money and credits to procure these necessities abroad. This process exhausts funds which are urgently needed for reconstruction. Thus a very serious situation is rapidly developing which bodes no good for the world. The modern system of the division of labor upon which the exchange of products is based is in danger of breaking down.
The truth of the matter is that Europe’s requirements for the next 3 or 4 years of foreign food and other essential products — principally from America — are so much greater than her present ability to pay that she must have substantial additional help, or face economic, social, and political deterioration of a very grave character.
The remedy lies in breaking the vicious circle and restoring the confidence of the European people in the economic future of their own countries and of Europe as a whole. The manufacturer and the farmer throughout wide areas must be able and willing to exchange their products for currencies the continuing value of which is not open to question.
Aside from the demoralizing effect on the world at large and the possibilities of disturbances arising as a result of the desperation of the people concerned, the consequences to the economy of the United States should be apparent to all. It is logical that the United States should do whatever it is able to do to assist in the return of normal economic health in the world, without which there can be no political stability and no assured peace. Our policy is directed not against any country or doctrine but against hunger, poverty, desperation, and chaos. Its purpose should be the revival of working economy in the world so as to permit the emergence of political and social conditions in which free institutions can exist. Such assistance, I am convinced, must not be on a piecemeal basis as various crises develop. Any assistance that this Government may render in the future should provide a cure rather than a mere palliative. Any government that is willing to assist in the task of recovery will find full cooperation, I am sure, on the part of the United States Government. Any government which maneuvers to block the recovery of other countries cannot expect help from us. Furthermore, governments, political parties, or groups which seek to perpetuate human misery in order to profit therefrom politically or otherwise will encounter the opposition of the United States.
It is already evident that, before the United States Government can proceed much further in its efforts to alleviate the situation and help start the European world on its way to recovery, there must be some agreement among the countries of Europe as to the requirements of the situation and the part those countries themselves will take in order to give proper effect to whatever action might be undertaken by this Government. It would be neither fitting nor efficacious for this Government to undertake to draw up unilaterally a program designed to place Europe on its feet economically. This is the business of the Europeans. The initiative, I think, must come from Europe. The role of this country should consist of friendly aid in the drafting of a European program so far as it may be practical for us to do so. The program should be a joint one, agreed to by a number, if not all European nations.
An essential part of any successful action on the part of the United States is an understanding on the part of the people of America of the character of the problem and the remedies to be applied. Political passion and prejudice should have no part. With foresight, and a willingness on the part of our people to face up to the vast responsibilities which history has clearly placed upon our country, the difficulties I have outlined can and will be overcome

Was am 3. April in Bonn passiert ist

Für diese Seite sind noch keine Inhalte hinterlegt, aber diese folgen bald. Sie wissen, was am 3. April in Bonn passiert ist? Dann schreiben Sie uns doch!

Köpfe: Bobby Dale Sutton

Bobby Dale Sutton war ein hinsichtlich seiner Herkunft nicht erfasster Mann (45), der am 3. April 2012 in Tulsa (OK) von der Polizei erschossen wurde. Er selbst war mit einem Messer bewaffnet. Bobby Dale Sutton galt als psychisch verwirrt.

Dokumentiert: Trump auf twitter – 03. April 2012

Der 03. April 2012 war ein Dienstag und der 1066. Tag von Donald Trump auf twitter. Er schrieb an diesem Tag 9 Tweets, die zusammen insgesamt 256 Likes sowie 1.182 Retweets erhielten. Die tweets finden Sie hier bald.